The Venting Post - Speaking Out For A Better America

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Ponder This
Ponder This


Jay Leno "won't" retire. This is such a huge dilemma in this country that he has to defend his position on the Oprah Winfrey show? That other talk show hosts (Kimmel, for example) need to bash him on his own show?

Jay Leno has done nothing wrong. He is taking his job back, the same way anyone might who had "lost" a job they loved. Why shouldn't he be honored to have been invited back to the Tonight Show? Who of us turns down a job because someone else wants it?

Conan is a great guy who gave a great farewell. It spoke volumes to whom he is. Hopefully, he will go on to bigger and better things and continue to entertain those of us who love him.

Face the facts: Jay's 10pm show stinks and the ratings were low; the ratings are way down on the Tonight Show with Conan as host. Why is Jay wrong to accept NBC's offer?



A Time For Change? OH, I Get It, A Time For a Change BACK

When tuning into the late night news the other night, there on my screen appeared Madeline Albright. Madeline Albright???? Oh no, I thought, Obama’s not bringing Madeline Albright back for another four years. Little did I know it was even worse. I thought that was bad enough…and then they announced the possibility of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. “A time for change” ? What change? A change back to the Clinton administration, only WORSE?

According to the US Department of State website, the Secretary of State “is the President’s chief foreign affairs adviser.” Just exactly what “foreign policy” qualifications...


Voting In America

Election day. A long day for most, sitting on the edge of their seats, wondering if his or her candidate will claim victory. Stressful for some, indifferent to others, important to many. Impacting the world

Every year, and more especially every four, it brings on the question, just how accurate or fair is the voting system? Every city in every state...


Obama's Definition of Wealthy

               What exactly is Obama's definition of the "wealthy who will be taxed"? Well, in the beginning of the election season, it was people earning $250,000 or more per year. Next, along comes Joe Biden, proclaiming the wealthy are those who earn $150,000 or more per year...oh, and that those people are not patriotic unless they pay more than their fair share. The people who don't work or earn less than that, they are not required to be "patriotic"? Finally, Obama spends a fortune on an infomericial, in which he declares the wealthy includes those earning $200,000 or more per year. Which is it?

               The truth is, everyone will be taxed. Obama voted 100% of the time to raise taxes. 100%. 97 times he voted on tax issues, and 97 times he voted to raise taxes.

               The cost of Obama's "economic plan" will inevitbly raise the taxes on ayone earning more than $42,000 per year. That makes sense. 


Obama OOPS?

          There is much controversy and fear mongering around Obama's background. Many call the controversy "scare tactics" or "attacks". How can one argue with the man's own words? Comments such as these are not scare tactics or attacks, but actual facts, from the candidates own mouth. One must question how anyone could make a mistake like this one. Would you?

Listen carefully.



  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »

Page 1 of 2

Login Form

Captcha code Type characters you see. (Click on image to refresh)
Type characters you see.
About captcha Project ::  Kupala.Net

Facebook Share

Share on facebook